本书提供了珍贵的第一手资料，使我们得以观察布拉格学派思想的传承和发展。由于布拉格学派成员的国际性，研究领域的多亲性，任何一部读本都难以反映学派的全貌，而只能作为一个便利的出发点。

Preface
Philip A.Luelsdorff
Ⅰ.STUDIES IN SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS
Sentence Patterns and Verb Classes
On the So-Called Semantic and Grammatical Stlucture of the Sentence
Subject and Predicate
On Case Theory
Some Thoughts on the Semantic Structure of the Sentence
Valency and Intention
The Sentence as a Text Unit
Ⅱ.STUDIES IN MORPHOLOGY
On Morphological Oppositions
Ⅲ.LEVELS OF LANGUAGE SYSTEM
Hierarchy and Overlap ofLanguage Levels
Notes on the So：Called Transposition
On Analogy and Anomaly
Ⅵ. GRAPHEMICS
Some Remarks on Revaluations of Redundant Graphemes
Ⅴ. LEXICON
The Invariant Meaning of Derived Words
Comparison of the Vocabularies of Related and Unrelated Languages
Ⅵ. SOCIOLINGUISTICS
Code Switching without Bilingualism in Czech
Ⅶ. CONTRASTIVE LINGUISTICS
Contrastive Comparison and Other Types of Polylingual Description
On the Contrastive Study of Cognate Languages
Index of authors
Index of subjects

      On the So-Called Semantic and Grammatical Structure ofthe Sentence*
      Milo? Dokulil and Franti-ek Dane?
      In recent years syntactic investigations have undergone new revival anddevelopment．Besides syntheric works，also a series of valuable contribu-fions in iournals and miscdlanies has appeared．However，it must be statedtllatthisdevelopment suffersfromahighmethodological，notional andalsoterminologicaldisparity，andoftenevenfromalackofclearanalysis．Thuswe are convinced that in the given situation it is necessary and urgent toreconsider the general questions of sentence structure，to aim at a clarification of the basic notions and of the principles of the procedure of syntacticanalysis．In this contribution we certainly do not try to present a definitivesolution to the given questions；rather．ideas are presented for discussion．We take up insights of older scholars．and attempt to clarify the principalviewpoints which should be used as starting points for the analysis ofsyntax．
Whenformulating(oranalyzing)asenteace，erofthelanguagehastoknownotonlYtheconstructionalmaterialofthe senfence，thewords andtheir syntactic properties and possibilities，but also the overall constructionplan of the sentence，which is determined in principle by its integral“grammatical”meaning，i.e. by an entire abstraction of the sententialconicnL Precisely in the sense in which the grammatical properties ofwords represent hasically a (high-level) abstraction of the specific lexicalmeanings of words and of specific relationships between these meanings (certainly，these grammatical properties are not only a reflection ofreality，but also an expression of the organizing principle of sentence structure).